Used to and would are
both use to describe something that happened regularly in the past but
doesn't happen any longer, as shown in the following two sentences
about quitting smoking:
However, there
are two important differences between used to and would. The
first difference is that would should not be used unless
it has already been established that the time frame is in the past,
while used to does not require this. This example,
with used to at the beginning, sounds natural:
- I used to watch
cartoons every Saturday morning when I was very little. Now I rarely watch TV.
However,
when used to is replaced with would, the same
example becomes awkward and ungrammatical:
- *I
wouldwatchcartoons every Saturday morning when I was very little. Now I rarely watch TV. This sentence is not correct!!!
But if the past
time frame is established before would appears,would sounds
fine.
- When I was little,
I would get up and watch cartoons every Saturday morning.
Now I rarelywatch TV.
The second
difference between used to and would is
that would is not used with stative verbs such as love,
be, understand, and feel. Compare
thesetwosentenceswith thestativeverb love:
- When I was a student,
I used to love sleeping late on the weekends.
(natural and grammatical)
- *When I was a
student, I
would lovesleeping late on weekends. (awkward and ungrammatical) Not correct.
Also, would CANNOT be used in negative form WOULDN'T when refering to regular past actions or routines.
To summarize,
the use of would is more restricted than that of used
to. Therefore, if you aren't sure which one to use, it's best to
choose used to.
taken from:
http://www.learnersdictionary.com/qa/the-difference-between-used-to-and-would
taken from:
http://www.learnersdictionary.com/qa/the-difference-between-used-to-and-would
No comments:
Post a Comment